lv t30 vs lv t45 | LV lv t30 vs lv t45 For lifters, the LV-T30/T45 and Mainsail are great. No reason not to use them. LV-T45 has thrust vectoring, which makes it better for controlling a craft (the engine can rotate slightly to direct the thrust) than an LV-T30. $324.99
0 · What Engines Do you Use for Missions to other Planets?
1 · Theoretical maximum deltaV and how to get beyond it.
2 · MainSail vs Skipper vs 5 x LV
3 · LV
4 · Engine Efficiency question. : r/KerbalAcademy
5 · Any Reasons Not to Use LV
6 · 2.5m Engine Clusters vs. 2.5m Engines
$2,500.00
For lifters, the LV-T30/T45 and Mainsail are great. No reason not to use them. LV-T45 has thrust vectoring, which makes it better for controlling a craft (the engine can rotate slightly to direct the thrust) than an LV-T30. The Swivel is similar to the LV-T30 "Reliant" Liquid Fuel Engine, but with a slightly smaller thrust chamber, higher expansion ratio, and thrust vector control. Its slightly reduced thrust and considerably increased mass . Did the LV-T30 and -45 get completely new models in 1.4(.x)? Or are they supposed to have variants? I can tell those engines look quite different now, but I can't .Using the standard FL-T800 and a small inline probe core, and using Mechjeb to calculate delta-V stats to remove any chance of error, the LV-45 provides 3871 m/s of delta-V in a vacuum while .
For the LV-T30 vs LV-T45 test you described, a few different things could have made their performance seem similar.My standard mid-size launcher is 1.5 orange tanks worth of fuel with 4 LV-T45 swivels around a single LV-T30 Reliant in the center. Then, anywhere from 2 to 8 Thumper boosters. Upper stages change based on payload.
Instead I've found that an engine cluster of 5 LV-T30 and 4 LV-T45s provides about 300N more thrust then the mainsail with better Isp. I use the airplane tails and radial . For the LV-N on stock tankage, that's 17,261 m/s. For the PB-ION, 36,108 m/s. The most straightforward way to get more ÃŽâ€V is to make a craft multi-stage, giving you effective mass ratios far beyond the limit of the stock .LV-T45 "Swivel" is a sustainer methalox engine and a returning part from KSP 1. It is unlocked by default in the Starting Rocketry research node. It features a typical single nozzle design. The Reliant has the highest Thrust to Cost ratio of any liquid fueled engine in the game, meaning it produces a kN of thrust most cheaply. This makes it one of the most cost-effective engines in career, although compensating for .
For lifters, the LV-T30/T45 and Mainsail are great. No reason not to use them. LV-T45 has thrust vectoring, which makes it better for controlling a craft (the engine can rotate slightly to direct the thrust) than an LV-T30. The Swivel is similar to the LV-T30 "Reliant" Liquid Fuel Engine, but with a slightly smaller thrust chamber, higher expansion ratio, and thrust vector control. Its slightly reduced thrust and considerably increased mass reduces its specific thrust, making it . Did the LV-T30 and -45 get completely new models in 1.4(.x)? Or are they supposed to have variants? I can tell those engines look quite different now, but I can't remember if they're supposed to have variants that also include their old models..Using the standard FL-T800 and a small inline probe core, and using Mechjeb to calculate delta-V stats to remove any chance of error, the LV-45 provides 3871 m/s of delta-V in a vacuum while the LV-N provides 6882 m/s, almost double the amount of delta-V on the LV-45.
For the LV-T30 vs LV-T45 test you described, a few different things could have made their performance seem similar.
What Engines Do you Use for Missions to other Planets?
Theoretical maximum deltaV and how to get beyond it.
My standard mid-size launcher is 1.5 orange tanks worth of fuel with 4 LV-T45 swivels around a single LV-T30 Reliant in the center. Then, anywhere from 2 to 8 Thumper boosters. Upper stages change based on payload. Instead I've found that an engine cluster of 5 LV-T30 and 4 LV-T45s provides about 300N more thrust then the mainsail with better Isp. I use the airplane tails and radial attachment points in 4 symmetry to attach the engines.
For the LV-N on stock tankage, that's 17,261 m/s. For the PB-ION, 36,108 m/s. The most straightforward way to get more ÃŽâ€V is to make a craft multi-stage, giving you effective mass ratios far beyond the limit of the stock fuel tanks.
LV-T45 "Swivel" is a sustainer methalox engine and a returning part from KSP 1. It is unlocked by default in the Starting Rocketry research node. It features a typical single nozzle design. The Reliant has the highest Thrust to Cost ratio of any liquid fueled engine in the game, meaning it produces a kN of thrust most cheaply. This makes it one of the most cost-effective engines in career, although compensating for the lack of gimballing may cause the final rocket to be more expensive. For lifters, the LV-T30/T45 and Mainsail are great. No reason not to use them. LV-T45 has thrust vectoring, which makes it better for controlling a craft (the engine can rotate slightly to direct the thrust) than an LV-T30.
The Swivel is similar to the LV-T30 "Reliant" Liquid Fuel Engine, but with a slightly smaller thrust chamber, higher expansion ratio, and thrust vector control. Its slightly reduced thrust and considerably increased mass reduces its specific thrust, making it . Did the LV-T30 and -45 get completely new models in 1.4(.x)? Or are they supposed to have variants? I can tell those engines look quite different now, but I can't remember if they're supposed to have variants that also include their old models..Using the standard FL-T800 and a small inline probe core, and using Mechjeb to calculate delta-V stats to remove any chance of error, the LV-45 provides 3871 m/s of delta-V in a vacuum while the LV-N provides 6882 m/s, almost double the amount of delta-V on the LV-45.
For the LV-T30 vs LV-T45 test you described, a few different things could have made their performance seem similar. My standard mid-size launcher is 1.5 orange tanks worth of fuel with 4 LV-T45 swivels around a single LV-T30 Reliant in the center. Then, anywhere from 2 to 8 Thumper boosters. Upper stages change based on payload. Instead I've found that an engine cluster of 5 LV-T30 and 4 LV-T45s provides about 300N more thrust then the mainsail with better Isp. I use the airplane tails and radial attachment points in 4 symmetry to attach the engines.
For the LV-N on stock tankage, that's 17,261 m/s. For the PB-ION, 36,108 m/s. The most straightforward way to get more ÃŽâ€V is to make a craft multi-stage, giving you effective mass ratios far beyond the limit of the stock fuel tanks.LV-T45 "Swivel" is a sustainer methalox engine and a returning part from KSP 1. It is unlocked by default in the Starting Rocketry research node. It features a typical single nozzle design.
MainSail vs Skipper vs 5 x LV
dior paragon
$15K+
lv t30 vs lv t45|LV
